Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚔ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 403 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#capitalism#https#bronze#trust#age#should#each#capital#com#commerce

Discussion (20 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

spudlyo•about 2 hours ago
It's interesting that commerce/business was this sophisticated in the Bronze Age. I guess it's not that surprising given the famous customer service complaint[0] cuneiform tablet to Ea-nāṣir about receiving the wrong grade of copper ingots and his servant receiving rude service.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complaint_tablet_to_Ea-n%C4%81...

chr15m•8 minutes ago
Here's the original paper if you want to skip the slop: https://keremcosar.uvacreate.virginia.edu/publications/BCCH-...
AngryData•about 1 hour ago
A lot of people underestimate the bronze age and all the limelight goes to later Greeks and Romans because we have better records of them. But the bronze age and its empires were just as impressive in my opinion. Tin is not a very common metal to find and there are only significant deposits in a limited number of places around the globe. The trade routes required to support bronze production were thousands of miles long.
nativeit•about 1 hour ago
Should we be surprised that economics preceded economists?
yieldcrv•34 minutes ago
I’m glad they have evidence, the glamorization is inaccurate

People that trust each other just learned to set that current trust in stone, literally, in case it didn’t last

The regulators allow people that trust each other far less to do business and engage in the same agreements

In some fields, completely anonymous people that don’t trust each other at all, can now transact and pool capital spontaneously

These are things governed by protocols or regulators

pram•about 1 hour ago
ā€œThe word ā€œcapitalismā€ would not be coined for another 3,800 years. Adam Smith was 3,700 years from picking up his pen.ā€

This is pretty bad writing lol. Markets are as old as civilization itself, Adam Smith obviously knew this. General commerce != capitalism

dudeinjapan•about 1 hour ago
I'm looking for the tablet that says "We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune..."
psychoslave•39 minutes ago
Obviously not exactly that, but egalitarian regims in complex societies was apparently a thing, or at least strong evidences back this scenario.

https://asiatimes.com/2023/06/mystery-of-missing-indus-valle...

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/indus-val...

jrm4•about 1 hour ago
I hope people get the right message from this, which is:

The way people talk about "Capitalism" is most often silly and counterproductive because most of the time -- the person that hates capitalism and the person that loves capitalism are talking about nearly entirely different things.

t-3•41 minutes ago
Capitalism was a term coined by Marx, so not really surprising that most using it are anti-capitalist.
dudeinjapan•about 1 hour ago
Also, should we capitalize the "C" in "Capitalism"? One might think we should, because C is a capital letter. But capital itself is lowercase, and therein lies the paradox.
AbrahamParangi•about 1 hour ago
This is AI generated slop.
dgellow•8 minutes ago
Damn, you’re right. It’s a surprisingly well written article for an AI, but reading it again with hindsight I see Claude fingerprints all over it
usernamed7•3 minutes ago
it started out alright, but then it just became obvious.

> Wall Street calls it securitization. The merchants of Assur called it Tuesday.

was the give away for me.

thesmtsolver2•about 1 hour ago
What signs do you see?
roywiggins•about 1 hour ago
Long sequences of short sentences. Not X, but Y.

And Pangram flags it, too.

https://www.pangram.com/history/126831e1-562f-4e65-9874-5250...

oxonia•about 1 hour ago
Yup - pretty obvious.