Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 306 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#source#repos#code#repo#open#projects#monorepo#rust#used#sync

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

schrodinger•about 2 hours ago
To those who have used it: is it handy for situations where you have multiple repos that want to share a little code, but it's not worth the trouble of extracting a library, referencing it, publishing versioned releases, updating dependent repos, etc?

And instead just "sync" a code folder from one main repo (perhaps containing common domain models) to other repos?

Basically the Go philosophy that a little bit of copying is better than a lot of dependency?

ASinclair•about 2 hours ago
It’s largely used for syncing external open source projects with the monorepo. Policy is to require source code imports over built artifacts. Though you can get exceptions.

Some projects are also developed in the monorepo and exported via Copybara.

My team also uses it to version Starlark rule sets internally.

paulddraper•41 minutes ago
Source code imports versus artifacts really neither here nor there. Go is source code imports too.

The key part for Copybara is that Google will make changes to the OSS projects from within the internal repo and everyone else will make changes to the OSS projects.

xyzzy_plugh•about 2 hours ago
It's for when you have a monorepo internally, and want to publish parts of it as open source to the world. They still need to live in the monorepo, so this is the solution.

Having a public repo as a dependency for your private corporate repo is a pain in the ass development-wise. Having a tree of such dependencies is a migraine.

MarkSweep•about 2 hours ago
Some other interesting tools in the space. Rust is using a tool called Josh to sync commits:

https://josh-project.dev

The blog post from the Rust people:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/06/04/how-josh-h...

Meta used to have an open source tool called fbshipit. But according to its open source repo they no longer use it:

https://github.com/facebookarchive/fbshipit

Any others in this space?

namanyayg•about 3 hours ago
Nice, I built something similar ~5 years ago using nested git repos and scripts to accomplish a similar purpose of combined private and public repos.

My shell script definitely wasn't google scale tho!

UnfitFootprint•about 3 hours ago
Yep, same. I thought it might a wrapper around git subtree but looks like it’s doing quite a lot more!

For example altering commit author emails during sync

lysace•about 3 hours ago
Cute name. (Naming is hard and important.)
whh•about 3 hours ago
That tune is in my head again... again...