Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 348 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#models#ram#usable#tier#detect#wrong#model#accurate#gpu#mac

Discussion (14 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

roboror•about 1 hour ago
Identified every component of my system incorrectly. W11.
haeberli•about 1 hour ago
auto-detect failed to correctly detect 128GB ram vs 32GB ram on MacBook Pro M5
nickv•about 1 hour ago
Me too. I have the same spec model (M5 Max with 125gb of ram) and it reports as 32gb.
jsherer•about 1 hour ago
I find this to be pretty accurate: https://www.canirun.ai/
not_your_vase•about 2 hours ago
That's not very accurate. It sees 8 GB RAM instead of 64. And it detects GTX 9 GPU, though I have an RTX30 one.

(Edit: now it came to my mind that Firefox has fingerprinting protection by default. But even after whitelisting this website, the result is the same)

embedding-shape•about 1 hour ago
I get "NVIDIA GeForce 8800" (?) in Firefox, and "ANGLE (NVIDIA Corpor" [sic] in Chromium/Chrome, the GPU is a RTX Pro 6000. I'm guessing if it doesn't have exact hit it basically picks at the top/bottom of the list?
spprashant•about 2 hours ago
For some reason it is not able to detect 64GB RAM on my Fedora Linux mini PC. It shows only 8GB.
majormunky•about 2 hours ago
Yeah, similar situation here, it shows 16gb on my 64gb mac
jrm4•about 1 hour ago
Interestingly wrong; probably has to do with the fingerprinting and whatnot.

I do appreciate that the "canirun" one

1) was also wrong 2) but let me pick my real card from the dropdown with results that seemed much more accurate.

Genuine question - is there literally any factor besides RAM and GPU (with VRAM info?)

kumarski•about 4 hours ago
and no I'm not a software develpoer - just smacked it together with minimax for personal needs.

Thought it was nifty so shared. Would love to see a real CS person's version of this and/or best prompt to build something like this accurately and keep it up to date as models advance and SOTA shifts.

nailer•about 2 hours ago
Great idea! You're 95% of the way there and the rest is a couple of UI tweaks.

1. I thought the table showing a bunch of models after my laptop specs would be models I could run on my laptop.

    Model Tier Example Models Params RAM Needed Your Status
    Top SOTA GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini Ultra 1T+ Datacenter —
    Large Models Llama 3 70B, Mistral Large, Command R+ 70B 64 GB  Usable
    Mid Models Llama 3 8B, Mistral 7B, Phi-3 Medium 7-13B 16 GB  Usable
    Small Models Phi-3 Mini, Llama 3 2B, Gemma 2B 1-3B 4 GB  Your Tier
'Your tier' is too subtle. I would make 'Your tier' highlight the ENTIRE row in some bright color to make it more obvious, and maybe fade the other rows slightly.

2. I don't know what 'usable' means. How can these models be status:usable if they are not 'my tier'? I deduce 'usable' doesn't mean usable on my laptop but I don't know what 'usable' does mean.

3. Give me links to set up the best model I can.

kumarski•about 2 hours ago
Thank you G!
cyanydeez•about 2 hours ago
One word: wrong.
nailer•about 2 hours ago
This isn't constructive feedback. In my case it detected my Mac's capablities accurately and gave me models to use. What was wrong about it?
haeberli•about 1 hour ago
my case, did not detect my Mac's capabilities accurately