Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

60% Positive

Analyzed from 553 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#privacy#website#anonymity#page#ability#service#named#looks#internet#web

Discussion (16 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ElProlactin•about 1 hour ago
One thing that I find useful is to look at the about page, as well as terms of service or privacy policy, of any website.

If there's no entity named, or you can't verify that a named entity actually exists, it's a red flag.

In this case, there's no individual or company named anywhere that I can see. Not on the About page, and not in any of the legal agreements. And the phone number looks like it's a VoIP number from Onvoy, a major wholesaler, which is a yellow flag.

NewsGotHacked•17 minutes ago
Agreed. Also the address listed on the about page is looks to be to the Texas Sculpture Garden in Frisco Texas. Sounds like a park, not an office.
RevEng•about 2 hours ago
I think this will become ever more common as AI improves. We used to joke, "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog," but now that is clearly true for AI agents. They can automate every part of the process, from domain and hosting registration, to web content creation, to responses to emails and even phone calls. Entire personas are trivial to create and maintain. This is what many companies are openly trying to do as cost cutting measures, but taken to its extreme you end up with entire companies generating income that are entirely agent driven. So long as the tokens cost less than the revenues they can generate, people will deploy these to passively make money for them, just like the early 2000s when there were entire webpages just present to show ads to unsuspecting visitors.
NordStreamYacht•5 minutes ago
My favourite from that era was the million pixel page where you paid $1 for a pixel which would link back to your own website.
jbethune•about 1 hour ago
It's interesting to notice which fields try to garner positive publicity by emphasizing that they DON'T use AI. There is increasing negativity about AI generally but it is quite revealing for an organization to try to make their refusal to use it a big part of their identity. Maybe I can start offering artisanal software development services to go after that sweet hipster dollar - code done 100% by hand, cruelty-free.
ElProlactin•7 minutes ago
I think there are two problems:

1. Most of the negativity about AI seems to relate to the economic effects, not the technology itself.

2. From what I've seen, the average person is still unable to identify AI created content, websites, etc. The website this post is about is clearly vibe coded (looks like everything including the copy is from Claude) but I'd guess that only a small fraction of the people who see it will recognize that.

GolfPopper•about 1 hour ago
So the government is going to track down everyone involved with running Research Gold and prosecute them for fraud, right?
floren•about 1 hour ago
It's got "Gold" in the name, it may very well be a Trump operation.
anigbrowl•about 3 hours ago
I got downvoted the other day for saying that anonymous website ownership and perverse financial incentives are bad for the health of the internet.
GaryBluto•about 2 hours ago
Most consider privacy important.
coffeefirst•about 1 hour ago
Yes, I would agree that privacy is important, that anonymity is valuable to the freedom of speech, and that OP is also right about the health of the web.

Which means we have a big problem.

applfanboysbgon•44 minutes ago
OP may be right about the health of the web, but for the wrong reasons. Anonymous website ownership has absolutely nothing to do with anything causing the biggest problems on the internet.
dcow•about 1 hour ago
Anonymity == Privacy is such a huge misconception in our industry it borders on deliberate.
GaryBluto•about 1 hour ago
I'd argue anonymity is a component of privacy.
applfanboysbgon•42 minutes ago
Anonymity is the ability to interact with other human beings while maintaining your privacy. In other words, it is the ability to use privacy. Privacy alone only gives you the ability to keep a journal of your political opinions without someone reading it. Anonymity gives you the ability to publish those political opinions in public without being persecuted for it by the current or any future group in power.

There is no misconception. I would suggest the inverse, that it seems deliberate to try to draw a line between the two and suggest that it makes any sense to have one without the other.

mhitza•about 1 hour ago
For individuals, yes. For service providers, no.
forgetfreeman•about 2 hours ago
If that were actually true the tech industry would not have minted trillions building a global digital panopticon.
walrus01•about 1 hour ago
Much of it in the ultimate service of selling very targeted advertising.