Superconducting monolayer cuprate with a single CuO2 plane

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

iandanforth•about 2 hours ago

The writing here seems very odd. It reads like a product announcement or blog page, not an article in Nature. I'm left questioning its validity.

pama•about 2 hours ago

Hmm. I didn’t get that impression from a quick skim. Just curious: what makes you think that?

kzrdude•about 2 hours ago

I would guess it's the 'vast' and the 'unprecedented' for example.

gestalt1•about 1 hour ago

Maybe just a combination of academic jargon and English not being the authors first language? At this point I would also not be surprised if language models are used for writing abstracts.

ironqcold•about 2 hours ago

I noticed that too.The writing style itself seems a bit strange. I'm not deep into superconductors, so I can't judge the science itself but I have doubts about how much trust this article can give.

oliculipolicula•1 day ago

That was fun but this is gun?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-026-03375-4

The two teams could "synergize" their tacit knowledge, overcome "involution"?

Without open peer review like in the old days it's hard, even with frontier models, for nonexperts to know if the above breakthrough was (unfairly?) relegated or how significant TFA is truly

Superconducting monolayer cuprate with a single CuO2 plane

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews