Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 123 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#patents#more#advanced#evil#better#example#https#software#redundancy#protocol

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

unfitted2545•about 3 hours ago
Are patents a necessary evil?
dlcarrier•21 minutes ago
I used to think they were entirely useless, but since then I've learned of many instances where a much better technology is developed because the first iteration is patented.

For example, the Wright brothers biggest contribution to aviation was suing everyone using wing warping (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers_patent_war) which greatly advanced the adoption of the much more advanced ailerons.

Software patents have a similar effect, for example Cisco's patent on Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol led to the development of the more secure and more capable Common Address Redundancy Protocol (https://jacobfilipp.com/DrDobbs/articles/SA/v14/i05/a6.htm).

We tend to invest heavily in whatever we can get working first, but it's rarely close to an ideal way of doing something. By pushing every developer to find a newer, better way of doing something, patents prevent stagnation and lead to more advanced technologies.

ThrowawayTestr•37 minutes ago
Software patents, no. They're just evil.