DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
50% Positive
Analyzed from 903 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#https#com#windows#should#linux#ubuntu#skull#wallpaper#www#logo

Discussion (49 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
https://www.zdnet.com/article/canonical-turns-20-shaping-the...
Ah, that would be 8.10 with the coffee stain wallpaper :-P
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ubuntu_screenshot.png
Windows has been free since at least VXKC4. Microsoft wouldn’t exist as anything but an Excel vendor today if it were any other way; it’s intentional.
(Ubuntu was the right choice.)
[0] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20170418-00/?p=95...
https://hardcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/038-design...
cought me off guard while drinking coffee
Looking at it from a distance indeed may raise some brows.
Have to say this never would have occurred to me. There are also examples of US people being offended by scenes considered harmless in other cultures, ie the Totoro bathtub scene [1], search for "family bathing scene".
I guess if this hologram offended people, there must be some nice stories about Nirvana's Nevermind (1991).
[0] https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-butt...
[1] https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/my-neighbour-totoro-10-things-di...
Good news! Cornholio.ai isn't registered by anyone as a domain name, so someone with sufficient motivation and a love for Beavis and Butthead could totally instruct an LLM to make a satirical AI-butthole-logo themed website.
Bonus points if it has affiliate links to Amazon or other online stores selling TP (for the bunghole, of course).
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/oct/02/nirvana-neverm...
Windows doesn't need or deserve defending. It's atrocious. But this is a silly comment.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...
Did this comment already put me on a list?
How dare you violate the government's exclusive right to naked children!
If this body part is obscene, shouldn’t the author do the moral thing and remove his own?
I also think it would be very impolite to make fun of your clients on the internet for a stupid request while naming them explicitly while doing so.