DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
25% Positive
Analyzed from 267 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#language#performance#results#popular#idea#important#feature#agent#popularity#https

Discussion (12 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
This is explicitly called out as only weakly supported in that blog post:
It makes sense, needing to train the model on things that aren't already in its weighs takes up valuable context. Until we have models that update their weights based on what they've seen in their recent sessions and learn like people, this will be a problem.
For now, though, between the results I'm seeing here, and the lack of need to look at code, I think this kills off any reason for me to use less popular languages.
I don't think there's really ever a downside to leaning in and making use of a language or system that works for you. Trying to tell people they should just use the popular thing is, imo, bad advice to turn hackers and experimenters into boring people.
I didn’t actually do anything with that idea yet but may look at the idea in Elixir this weekend.