Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 130 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#backup#storage#cloud#title#local#pbs#data#hardware#probably#inaccurate

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

t098i3•about 1 hour ago
HN title is inaccurate - article is about a single local PBS station, not PBS the national broadcast network. (Source title is unambiguous)
qchris•about 2 hours ago
What kills me about this is that 50 TB isn't actually that much data, and they could have pretty easily had a first-party, offline backup of this. You can buy a 16 TB hard disk for <$700 on Newegg (even with the storage price increases), and any halfway-decent IT person could have set up their own storage backup server with a ZFS pool on commodity hardware within a day or two. That's probably, all in, probably under <$3k in hardware and a bit of labor to have a local redundant backup (of cold, rarely accessed media) for everything before they uploaded it to the cloud that would have de-risked this whole situation enormously.
ramgine•about 3 hours ago
I know this has been posted a few times but execs need to learn “cloud” is just someone else’s storage they control. If the data is critical it can’t be in the cloud only.