Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

66% Positive

Analyzed from 3128 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#musk#spacex#more#things#space#launch#need#actually#building#lot

Discussion (167 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

chasd00•about 4 hours ago
Man if this actually starts to happen it's a good time to be a welder, concrete worker, or any general contractor or tradesman in Louisiana. Coastal Louisiana is some of the poorest areas in the US even more so than the valley in Texas where Starbase Texas is located. Probably 10-20 years worth of solid work building out that site.
swingandamiss•about 4 hours ago
A lot of good, hard working people in that area that would love to have these jobs open up.
ianm218•about 3 hours ago
It’s easy to be pessimistic about Musk timelines/ big tech but I am thrilled that ambitious, real world, hard projects are happening in the US again.
adamtaylor_13•about 3 hours ago
You're being down-voted (and so shall I) but I think you're right. Despite all the animosity towards him, Musk is doing things that are economically meaningful for our nation.

We'll need a few more of "him" to dig us out of this situation I reckon, but overall I still hope it's possible.

(Anyone asking antagonistic questions can go ahead and save their fingers, I won't respond to the petty comments.)

sockaddr•about 3 hours ago
Elon-types won't "dig us out" of our mess.

Removing parasitic elements in government spending and policy will. This starts with politics. We first need a healthy, educated, engaged, and safe population. All else follows. These are all things Elon actively works against. You aren't part of his future.

bko•about 1 hour ago
I don't know, government waste and most policy sucks. But there's no reason we can't do stuff or even try.

For instance, take Tesla. It wasn't anything revolutionary. Any auto manufacturer could have invested in battery technology and building a compelling EV, but they didn't. Same with manufacturing in America. Every manufacturer took as given that they have to outsource manufacturing to oversees and components to third parties. But it didn't have to be that way. It takes someone naive and optimistic enough to try something different.

ryandvm•about 2 hours ago
We just need more leeches.
watwut•about 2 hours ago
They will try to dig us out of the hole they created by their previoua digging.
nyc_data_geek1•about 2 hours ago
We need to tax all of "him" out of geopolitical relevance to fund a new New Deal, like we did after the first Gilded Age.
rurp•about 1 hour ago
Few Americans have done more than musk to destroy state capacity and to enable corruption on a massive scale, all while enriching himself to an unprecedented degree. That's great for him and his cronies that he has gotten so wealthy doing it, but he's been a huge net-negative to most humans.

I get that rockets are cool and a lot of people in the tech bubble think that starlink is the greatest thing ever, but most people don't care about that nearly as much as they care about seeing their children die from preventable diseases he cut the funding for or getting violently ill because he drove thousands of food inspectors and researchers out of a job.

Handling the enormous federal debt that he continues to play a part in worsening is going to very painful in the long run.

throwaway894345•35 minutes ago
Lol why is this downvoted? There is no dispute that he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect Trump and seat himself in government while his companies are financially dependent on government programs and contracts. This is an obvious conflict of interest, and also completely on par with all of the other corruption we're seeing from this administration.
throwaway894345•39 minutes ago
> economically meaningful for our nation

3,000 short term jobs doesn't put a dent in the thousands of jobs he has cut, not to mention the losses to our economy due to the tariffs, immigration policy, and deficit spending that he caused.

> We'll need a few more of "him" to dig us out of this situation I reckon

I'm of the impression that you can't corrupt your way out of corruption.

btmiller•about 1 hour ago
Discounting challenges to your beliefs by burying your head in the sand is certainly a choice.
miltonlost•about 1 hour ago
A few more Nazi saluting eugenicists will help us out! Truly we are at the Weimar levels.
watutalkinbout•about 2 hours ago
Musk is a marketing genius.
guywithahat•about 1 hour ago
I don't think he's known for his marketing, he's known for his engineering
Gud•about 2 hours ago
He was, until he took a chainsaw to things he didn’t understand.

I was a huge believer in Elon musk. I invested and made a lot of money in Tesla before Model S had even entered serial production. Now? Fuck you Elon, go Peter Beck…

UltraSane•about 3 hours ago
Musk has done a huge amount to put us INTO this situation.
ericmay•about 2 hours ago
Which situation did Elon Musk put us in to? Can you elaborate? When did this situation start? What happened? What did he personally do that put us in the situation?
zoomaboom•about 3 hours ago
Golden Dome might be "economically meaningful" but it will also lead to WWIII so, no thank you.
ericmay•about 2 hours ago
No it won't. Separately other countries don't get to dictate our internal policies or whether we decide to build any sort of missile defense system. If we're going to be nuked over it, then oh well they'll get nuked too. Never can we live as hostages to wanna-be dictators and tyrants (Xi Jingping, Vladimir Putin, IRGC, &c.) and if they want to blow the whole world up then so be it but acquiescing to their bullying is simply not an option. If you think it's an option, then we should issue our own nuclear threats and take them hostage instead.
tcmart14•about 2 hours ago
But its also hard not to be. I'm not a fan of Musk and it doesn't even have to do with Musk himself as its a common theme I see among a lot of the big tech companies or really any company doing a big project in my neck of the woods. An hour north east of me, there has been big on going data center projects for 10+ years. Sounds good right? I got a lot of family and friends in the trades. But I can almost set my watch to it. When work ramps up, its always good pay and 15 years of guaranteed work until suddenly its not. 8 months go by, suddenly everything is paused and all those contractors are out of work for a year and a half until things start up again. Then its rinse and repeat.
thegrim33•13 minutes ago
"I almost sold a car today, but if I did, sure it would have been some income, but who knows when the next time I would sell another car would be? Why bother? It's rinse and repeat"
mrcwinn•about 2 hours ago
Heck. Yeah. I'm with you. This is GOOD.

Social media is unhealthy. You know what else is unhealthy? Hacker News' constant bashing of every. single. thing. ever.

jrflowers•about 3 hours ago
I love that people see a website about one of musk’s ideas and go “wow this is real and happening” in the year of our lord 2026
testing22321•about 1 hour ago
These comments are so strange, because you’re demonstrating how far your head is in the sand, willfully.

Of course Musk talks big. He is almost always late. Lots of things have never happened, or have not yet worked (but they’re still trying)

At the same time he has monumental successes that nobody, ever, has achieved. Worlds safest car (multiple times) worlds highest selling car (model y), car of the year, massive factories building at a speed and quality that made Toyotas CEO say they’re in trouble and have a lot to improve.

The whole supercharger network that smashes every other one.

World’s first reusable rocket, done it 300 times now. Only two others have done it once. By far, by far more launches than every country and company in the world put together. Starship coming along.

To say that he never does anything is a very, very strange set of blinders to view the world through

jjulius•about 1 hour ago
>At the same time he has monumental successes that nobody, ever, has achieved.

"Nobody ever" doesn't really feel accurate here.

>Worlds safest car (multiple times)...

According to which body? Tesla's interpretation of NHTSA data? Some other organization? Did other cars prior to Tesla's inception obtain this title "multiple times"?

>... worlds highest selling car (model y)...

In 2023, the Y peaked at ~1.22 million. In 1923, the Model T sold ~2.09 million.

>... car of the year...

Numerous bodies label things "car of the year", and many cars were named that before and after Teslas were produced.

jrflowers•38 minutes ago
xboxnolifes•about 3 hours ago
Of all of Musk's ventures, SpaceX seems to actually do things and not just say they do things.
cwal37•about 4 hours ago
I wonder if anyone read the copy on this page or if it mostly came out of an LLM.

The "Restoring the shoreline" and Rebuilding the marshlands" paragraphs below the images are almost exactly the same. The first sentence is exactly the same.

mrtnmcc•about 3 hours ago
A way to get back at Texas for datacenter restrictions?

Ten pads and thousands of flights per year sure will accelerate Golden Dome, err... I mean "going to Mars"

randallsquared•about 3 hours ago
Terrestrial datacenter legal restrictions are how SpaceX expects to make a lot of its money in the next 10+ years, so I would be less surprised to find them lobbying for restrictions than against, presuming they spend at all on it.
bpodgursky•24 minutes ago
It's not a zero sum market, supply is nowhere near meeting demand, in the short term restrictions also hurt SpaceX because they are building out their own terrestrial datacenters in Memphis etc.
zoomaboom•about 3 hours ago
pinkmuffinere•about 1 hour ago
I wonder how coastal they intend to be. They make a lot of claims about repairing the wetlands and coastal regions, but a lot of it is likely going to be underwater in the next 25 years because of rising sea levels [0], regardless of how many wetlands are repaired. And I suspect infrastructure like this probably has to be usable for something like 100 years to payoff. Maybe they're actually going to build inland, where the eventual coast will be?

[0] https://www.klfy.com/louisiana/interactive-map-shows-which-p...

digitalsurgeonz•about 1 hour ago
considering how the capitalism the chosen framework of the westoid works. i will be watching it (burn and fail) with popcorn and my turkish coffee while enjoying fine persian carpets. this will be loaded with corruption and greed and will fail. I am taking bets.
dylan604•about 1 hour ago
From the hype video, it looks like they will be building towers in pairs. Hard to tell the distances, but if one explodes on the pad, will it's pair be in the blast radius? I'm guessing the plane will be to have a launch on one them and then move to the other for a faster launch cadence?
BugsJustFindMe•about 4 hours ago
> Building a new space coast

But are they building it ghost to ghost?

giancarlostoro•about 4 hours ago
Lol this is a reference to Florida (though I love your Space Ghost reference), we have the Kennedy Space Center, and an Airforce base (I guess its a Space Force base now) which has led to this area being referred to as "Space Coast" adding this in case anyone else might be unaware.

Florida is more interesting than people realize.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Coast

moberley•about 2 hours ago
Will they have to rename the other Starbase Louisiana? https://starbasela.org/
kemotep•about 4 hours ago
It’s hard to imagine that Cocoa Beach/Titusville isn’t receptive to this. I guess it’s probably cheaper? They don’t have to share the airspace with NASA and other launch companies and it becomes a fully owned and operated Freeport for Musk’s ventures.
estearum•about 3 hours ago
> Pecan Island and nearby wetlands are high-value habitat for migratory waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and other coastal wildlife. SpaceX is not developing the full footprint of the land and will preserve wetlands and wildlife habitat.

Pretty cynical corpo-ambiguity-speak, even by Musk standards.

We're supposed to be happy they're promising not to develop one-hundred percent of the land footprint? They will leave at least 0.00001% of land area as wetlands and therefore we oughta be happy?

Such empty bullshit it's more insulting they even put an environment-leaning section on the site. Just say "fuck it, our space fetish is more important than the wetlands."

nrmitchi•about 1 hour ago
Many industries, and SpaceX particularly, will say this like this, then a couple years later be like "oh, it's actually much easier if we destroy it", _do it_, then claim "oh well, nothing to be done now!" and push forward on something else.

"Promises" or "commitments" like this need to be evaluated based on the previous behavior of the people "making" them (although they were very careful with working to not use either of those words, and just imply them)

ceroxylon•about 3 hours ago
I agree, and the premise is that we're supposed to believe the remaining waterfowl are going to coexist peacefully with... rocket launches?

Evolution has done stranger things, but my bet is that the birds will find somewhere else to be over learning to not be startled by nearby earth-rumbling explosions.

bryanlarsen•about 3 hours ago
The wetlands around Cape Canaveral/Kennedy are thriving. Men with guns prevent people from getting too close to the rockets, and people do far more damage to wetlands than a rocket launch once every few days.

A rocket launch every hour or so as SpaceX is promising might be quite different.

miltonlost•about 1 hour ago
Kennedy is also surrounded my federally protected land. SpaceX? Noooope. Never trust Elon.
gen220•about 3 hours ago
Building multi-decade service life infrastructure on the coast in this era of the Anthropocene actually requires you (from an engineering point of view, not merely a regulatory one) to have a buffer zone of wetlands, marshes and sea walls to absorb storm surges.

You can still choose to read that cynically, but I think the cynical angle is taking moral ecological credit for a pragmatic engineering reality :P

estearum•about 2 hours ago
A single Starship launch produces motorcycle (100dB) to permanent hearing loss + immediate pain (140dB) sound out to about 7 miles.

Having that intermittently a couple times per day I think will be very disruptive.

gen220•about 2 hours ago
To be clear, I'm not trying to argue that this project is ecologically beneficial or neutral (I think that part is beyond debate for many reasons including the noise pollution you've identified)

I was just trying to say that the marshland restoration stuff is likely not lip service, insofar as they actually do need wetland buffer zone to keep their launchpads above sea level.

Advertisement
timcobb•about 3 hours ago
Why does this need to be built on the beach?
Tuna-Fish•about 3 hours ago
Because as China has shown, people get angry when you drop hundreds of tons of steel and propellant on people.

Rockets sometimes fail. SpaceX has one of the lowest failure rates in the industry, but that's still ~0.5%. When they fail near launch, they cause humongous explosions. Because of this, anyone with even a tiny bit of care for people launches over the ocean, so that when it goes oops, it only harms some fish.

The existing launch sites SpaceX uses are good for launching into prograde (Starbase, TX and Cape Canaveral, FL) and retrograde (Vandenberg SFB, CA) orbits, but they are all either unable or kind of marginal for launching into polar/very highly inclined orbits. (Starbase, TX cannot do it at all, Vandenberg SFB, CA has limitations on when you can launch, and Cape Canaveral, FL needs to fly a dogleg which reduces performance.)

Part of their plans for the space datacenters involve launching a lot of mass into sun-synchronous (which is very highly inclined) orbits. For that, they need a launch site with the ocean either to the north or to the south.

block_dagger•about 3 hours ago
So the (eastward) flight path isn't over populated land. Rapid disassembly and all that.
Tuna-Fish•about 3 hours ago
In this case, southward.
stronglikedan•about 3 hours ago
Presumably so rockets can get out over water as quickly as possible in case they fail.
jgdxno•about 3 hours ago
it is to ensure that nothing fall on people's heads
stonogo•about 3 hours ago
It doesn't. It doesn't even need to be built, since the Stennis Space Center is already there and already has an excluson zone. This is a vanity project.
edm0nd•about 3 hours ago
it needs to be built so they can launch from it so yes it does
Tuna-Fish•about 3 hours ago
Huh? Stennis Space Center is a propulsion research site, it's not usable for orbital launches. There are towns south of it.
maeln•about 3 hours ago
Feels like an impossible project that will end up being 5% of what was advertised (the 5% being what was actually planned all along), but is made with folie des grandeurs to pump a stock who's hype has died down.
sailfast•about 2 hours ago
Great place to put a star base for all the reasons listed, but, uh… does anyone buy for a second that Elon Musk gives a fig about the Louisiana coastline or the migratory birds?
MeetingsBrowser•about 3 hours ago
> Starbase, Louisiana will be built to support thousands of Starship flights a year. This self-sustaining spaceport will have propellant production, power generation, deep-water shipping capabilities, vehicle processing facilities, and an airport.

Sounds really neat, but "incredibly ambitious announcement" from an Elon Musk company is starting to wear thin.

Is this real, or will it join the graveyard of other incredibly ambitious projects that were eventually abandoned to focus on the next incredibly ambitious project.

DarmokJalad1701•about 3 hours ago
I can count plenty of incredibly ambitious announcements from them that have turned out amazing! In fact, they are an outlier in how many they have challenges they have taken on and succeeded in.

[x] Partially reusable rocket that dropped cost to orbit by an order of magnitude. And no, the space shuttle (while an amazing piece of engineering), doesn't really count. It cost a billion+ to refurbish and did nothing to make space more accessible. Now we have businesses that exist purely because the Falcon 9 exists. Heck, the entire new space industry got validated (and hence got investment) due to SpaceX's success.

[x] Returning human spaceflight capability to the US at a fraction of the price, using the same reusable rocket platform after the old defense primes failed to do so. And then making it cheap enough that it has now also flown about half as many private missions as it did for NASA.

[x] Global satellite constellation providing gigabit-scale internet with 10000+ satellite (once written off by "experts" as yet another "incredibly ambitious project" that will never happen).

[x] Commercializing and bringing down the cost of electric cars to the point where they are actually a viable option now (unlike the compliance cars made by OEMs 10 years ago).

[x] Building the largest rocket to ever exist that now has a clear path to being the first ever fully reusable launch vehicle.

[x] A BCI implant that has now brought back mobility and communication ability to multiple patients with debilitating conditions.

Given that each of these were things that no one had done successfully before, or had failed spectacularly - I don't really care that they took longer than initially planned.

There is, in fact, a graveyard here. It is mostly filled with confident predictions that his companies would never do the things they have since done.

miltonlost•44 minutes ago
Can't believe you forgot about Mechahitler and the CSAM creation robot! And the AMAZING hyperloop! And FSD is coming next year now (back when he said it in 2016, and every year since)!
DarmokJalad1701•8 minutes ago
> And the AMAZING hyperloop

Wow! Was there a Musk company dedicated to building that? Where is the press release announcing it? Surely it must have been a big deal if you are so excited about it's failure!

> And FSD is coming next year now

It is already here. You can hail one right now in multiple cities.

And in my own car, I use it every day and have for 2+ years. For the $3k I paid in 2019, I definitely got what I paid for. It's also gotten dramatically better since then. It drives me to and from work every day without having to so much as touch the wheel. And there is no 2018/19 non-Tesla that can do what it does.

So yes, by all means, keep listing the things you think prove Musk is a fraud. You're mostly just making my point for me.

bhelkey•about 3 hours ago
He often promises incredibly ambitious things that don't happen. But, with a fairly reasonable frequency, he promises incredibly ambitious that do happen.

For example, SpaceX is responsible for a massive spike in orbital launches [1].

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/yearly-number-of-objects-...

MeetingsBrowser•about 3 hours ago
SpaceX and Tesla are both successful companies doing really impressive things, but the more ambitious claims are almost always silently discarded.

Including robotaxis, tesla semi-trucks, hyperloop, optimus, roadster 2.0, cheap whole home batteries, true FSD, Mars landing, nueralink, and more I'm sure.

It is difficult for me to get excited about a decades long, ambitious project when the follow through rate is <10%.

mindwok•about 3 hours ago
He is definitely overly optimistic on timelines but pretty much all those things you mentioned are actually still happening, it's too early to say they haven't followed through.
randallsquared•about 3 hours ago
Several of these do exist already, and one of them was never a promised project. This objection seems like it's from 2016.
chasd00•about 2 hours ago
Gwynne Shotwell is the one that makes it happen at SpaceX. She has a pretty good track record so far so I'm not writing her off yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwynne_Shotwell

ratelimitsteve•about 2 hours ago
well, let's see what actually gets done. or even started.
ramesh31•about 4 hours ago
Ah, Louisiana — when even Texas won't let you pollute enough.
krunck•about 3 hours ago
I used to be interested in SpaceX development. Then I came to the realization that SpaceX is going to be used primarily for the militarization of space: hauling space based weaponry, weaponry drop ships, surveillance satellites, etc.

I still feel glad for the SpaceX engineers and scientists who succeed and doing new and innovative stuff. But their employer is just like every other military contractor sucking on the unlimited teets of the US Government. What a waste of taxpayer money.

I grew up in during the Cold War and I'm sick of this shit. America always thinking it has to dominate any country that doesn't bow down before it.

asadotzler•about 2 hours ago
It will be comms mostly, and mostly civilian. That other stuff will happen, but it'll be dwarfed by the effort of supporting several tens of millions of Starlink users.
mycodendral•about 3 hours ago
what's the alternative
infamouscow•about 2 hours ago
This is not a serious position.

Just because you personally prefer to be subjugated doesn't mean anyone else does. That necessarily means being able to defend yourself from bad actors, and history has proven the best way to do that is by investing in technology.

bigtex88•about 2 hours ago
Isn't this an absolutely horrible idea to build this here? What happens when the next Category 5 hurricane hits this area? It's an absolute certainty that they will get another Category 5 at some point.
jubilanti•less than a minute ago
FEMA flood maps for almost all of Vermilion Parish are VE/AE (highest flood risk) with coastal areas needing to be built 15ft above ground:

http://maps.lsuagcenter.com/floodmaps/?FIPS=22113

asadotzler•about 2 hours ago
Do you know where NASA's launch facilities are? The Florida coast.
btmiller•about 1 hour ago
The Florida coast isn't defined by a huge, meandering river. Take a look at some satellite surveys that showcase how the Mississippi River changes over time. We've of course damned up the shorelines upstream where people live in places like New Orleans so there's no inherent seasonal risk of mass flooding, though of course lose the deposited silt and hence further erode the land we've "saved". Further down south toward the mouth, it's marsh land defined by however the river chooses to meander. I'm not sure where exactly SpaceX is planning to setup in LA, but the entire coastline there is chronically very poor, very unpopulated, and not supported to weather flooding of any kind, especially not hurricanes.
ggreer•9 minutes ago
Pecan island is 40 miles away from the nearest distributary of the Mississippi (the Atchafalaya river), and there are several towns (and a highway) in between. It's the ocean & weather that erode the coastline in that area, not any rivers.
johnyzee•about 3 hours ago
"Watch Now" just shows a black screen with an audio track for me.
xyst•about 3 hours ago
same , you probably have ad blocking on and this video element has tracking/telemetry
officeplant•about 2 hours ago
As a local who will probably end up doing work for or adjacent to this project:

Fuck Elon get out of my state.

Advertisement
1auralynn•about 4 hours ago
[delayed]
xyst•about 3 hours ago
Space exploration is a pipe dream and fantasy that billionaires hope to have up and running just in time to "escape" the world they have helped destroy.

Prove me wrong bro

sfblah•about 1 hour ago
Humans will never be "multiplanetary" without something like warp drive.
fblp•about 2 hours ago
I wonder if we're at the point where this shoreline critical infrastructure would need more physical security / protection from the drones of adversaries.