Back to News
Advertisement

XCancel also down, at least for time being

oorange999 about 5 hours ago 92 comments

DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

Message on xcancel website:

"On Monday 24th August at 8PM EST, we received at letter from X Corp. asking to cease and desist the service XCancel. The service XCancel is stopped until further notice. We are seeking legal advice and won't share more details for now. Thank you for the trust you have put in these two years of XCancel."

https://xcancel.com/

Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

38% Positive

Analyzed from 2287 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#twitter#don#account#read#without#post#content#https#users#more

Discussion (92 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

afavour•about 3 hours ago
A real shame. Even if you put all the political arguments aside it sucks when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it.

For me that’ll mean I just don’t read content on there any more. Which I realise X doesn’t care about, I’m not monetisable anyway. But a shame nonetheless.

Arubis•about 3 hours ago
Indeed. I’d only reengaged with any Xitter content when I realized I could get it through xcancel. Without a door like this, it’s invisible to me.
xp84•about 3 hours ago
The modern hipster equivalent of "I don't even own a TV."
culi•about 3 hours ago
Over 85% of the US is not on twitter. It's not at all comparable to television.
afavour•about 3 hours ago
Surely not. Twitter is a niche social networking site. It’s something like 1/6 the active user base of Facebook, which would be the better comparison.
nozzlegear•about 3 hours ago
This seems really out of touch tbh.
happytoexplain•about 3 hours ago
Not even close. Any given social network is not ubiquitous, socially.
seattle_spring•about 3 hours ago
Not really. More like the modern equivalent of "I don't watch Fox News."
nomel•about 1 hour ago
> when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it.

Where does this come from? You can see the last few posts of an account [1], and the contents of a single posts, but minimal to no comments [2]. Videos play after dismissing the login popup.

I have no X account, but I read content there all the time without issue.

[1] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack

[2] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2091983940609245467

ryantgtg•22 minutes ago
I received an Amber Alert a few days ago, which linked to a Twitter post containing the details, and the "x" in the "plz login" modal that blocked the entire screen was non-functional. I just sat there pounding on the x, and then a little hand gif popped up and pointed at the login button.
kalleboo•22 minutes ago
> https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack

Only 5 posts, and when you click on any of them, you don't see the post, you see a sign up popup

gruez•38 minutes ago
A few months ago you needed to log in to view any replies, which was critical for some threads.
aarond0623•14 minutes ago
Unless it has changed, the posts are in random order; they aren't the latest, which makes the ones you see basically worthless.
mock-possum•about 1 hour ago
Not sure how you manage that - twitter, insta, and pinterest all begrudgingly let you see one, maybe two things, then lock down and prevent you from interacting without logging in.

It really gives the sense that you’re not wanted there.

And so I gladly oblige.

apparent•35 minutes ago
It's possible that the lack of these alternatives will decrease engagement enough that Twitter would loosen these rules. Perhaps not that likely, but it's possible.
BLKNSLVR•15 minutes ago
It goes against the whole “global town square" declaration.

Only if you're part of the club. If not, fuck off!

I choose to fuck off.

Waterluvian•about 3 hours ago
Reddit is the worst for this. I hate the disgusting, low class UX design where they let you read about 10-15 seconds of a page before locking you out.

Though I think Pinterest takes the cake for being just the ugliest example of this.

chrysoprace•about 2 hours ago
Old Reddit is now completely unusable without an account. Maybe it's time for me to finally stop using it.
ryandrake•about 2 hours ago
Interesting--I'm still using old.reddit.com with no problem, without an account. Maybe the change is not broadly rolled out?
hedora•about 2 hours ago
Do database dumps of it still exist?

Maybe it’s time to just download it and Wikipedia, then point an LLM / vectordb at it.

throwaway85825•about 2 hours ago
Old reddit on the tor onion domain still works for me.
mrtesthah•36 minutes ago
Use a LibReddit/Redlib/Teddit/etc. instance.
alex1138•about 2 hours ago
spez is a problem. And if it's not spez, then enlighten me. But they've taken years of built up network effects and absolutely wrecked it. It's so hostile when companies do this. They just ignore their users, straight up. That should be a firable offense. The customer is NOT 'always right', but you can meet them halfway

Fail upwards. That's all they know how to do

afavour•about 2 hours ago
> They just ignore their users, straight up.

Existing Reddit users aren’t affected by this regi wall UX because they’re already logged in. And as much as I hate the UX too… Reddit user numbers have grown a ton in the last few years. It’s difficult to make the argument that these changes are a failure.

AlexandrB•about 2 hours ago
> The customer is NOT 'always right', but you can meet them halfway

Reddit users are not customers. The advertisers and AI labs are the customers because they're the ones paying. The users are the cattle in the pen being sold to the advertisers and the monkeys at the typewriters whose output gets sold as AI training data.

UltraSane•about 2 hours ago
Sites that force you to login to actually use it feel very arrogant.
andsoitis•about 1 hour ago
> a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it.

That's not true for X. You can read content without being signed in.

https://help.x.com/en/safety-and-security/public-and-protect...

BLKNSLVR•11 minutes ago
Not in any useful way that makes Twitter better or different than other sources of news.
andsoitis•6 minutes ago
I can't think of another platform that carries a more diverse range of news and perspectives.

But that's beside the point. I was pointing out that X does allow non-logged in users view posts.

S0y•about 3 hours ago
https://joinmastodon.org/

https://bsky.app/

https://www.threads.com/

Pick literally any one of those, just seriously, if you're still on that platform, leave.

loufe•about 3 hours ago
I'm not sure why Threads makes your cut here, trading one walking negative externality of person in control for another is not really a sell to most folks.
Barrin92•about 2 hours ago
it has Fediverse interop. Skepticism obviously is warranted towards the owners but you can at least interact with an open protocol or consume threads content from a Mastodon instance, say.
pibaker•about 2 hours ago
Aren't many big mastodon instances talking about blocking Threads?

I don't like the mastodon culture but tbh I can't fault them for this move. Imagine if every post on r/all suddenly shows up on HN.

TkTech•about 2 hours ago
An interesting new one for Canadians (that's built on AT and interops with bsky) is https://gandersocial.ca/. It uses our national postal service's identity validation, so it dramatically reduces foreign actors and bots, and without handing PII to shady private companies like Persona. They collect no PII either, they just get an "is_a_human" response back from Canada Post.

You can still do read-only things like see threads and follow users as an anonymous user. Just can't post or comment. Only thing I don't like is that it's app-only for now.

huebnerob•about 2 hours ago
Wasn’t xcancel, sort of by definition, for people who have already left X?
numpad0•about 3 hours ago
They all get to the point where anime contents start flooding in pinning the system at capacity 24/7, scaring the wrong set of people, and then they chicken out and start dying a long death. This situation itself is downstream event of Twitter doing the same, in a sense.
davidw•about 3 hours ago
This article has a good explanation of why "you, yes you" should leave:

https://publiccomment.blog/p/it-is-past-time-for-you-to-quit...

xvxvx•about 4 hours ago
Yeah, it’s connected to Nitter.

I had a number of bookmarked X accounts I would check in on via xcancel. I’ll keep them for now but I assume they’re done for.

I have zero desire to ever crate an X account. Keep closing doors, Elon, and watch usage drop even more than it already has.

culi•about 3 hours ago
The LibRedirect extension lets you use any alt-frontend for [Twitter|YouTube|Reddit|Fandom|you name it] and automatically redirects you when you click a link. That way you can just save the original url and let your browser redirect for you. Would highly recommend

https://libredirect.manerakai.com/

It has some default options built in like Nitter for Twitter, Invidious for YouTube, Redlib for Reddit, etc

Yiin•about 3 hours ago
I don't understand being so emotionally attached to a personality to virtue signal about everything they're connected to. I'm no fan of the guy itself for many reasons, but it's just a service like any other, you either use it or you don't.
stuaxo•about 3 hours ago
Hardly any one is virtue signaling, but people vice signal all the time.
like_any_other•about 1 hour ago
Like most media, it's non-fungible. Many people post there and nowhere else. You may as well say "Oh the book you liked got pulled? Just pick a different book to read."
nozzlegear•about 2 hours ago
> I'm no fan of the guy itself for many reasons, but it's just a service like any other, you either use it or you don't.

It's not just a service, using it actively helps increase and spread his influence in the same way using Facebook/Insta/Threads helps increase and spread Zuck's influence, or using Truth Social helps spread Trump's influence.

frogperson•about 3 hours ago
The us system of government and many of its agencies are under attack by an administration that elon helped secure a win for. Excuse me for getting a little emotional towards a Nazi who supports the concentration camps we have on US soil.

I'll make every effort to avoid his products and bad mouth him every single time his name comes up.

he is hated.

hiddencost•about 2 hours ago
Have you considered that people actually have ethical beliefs and you're the one that is weird?
AlexandrB•about 2 hours ago
Have you considered that other's ethical beliefs may not match yours?
stock_toaster•about 3 hours ago
Especially rich coming from X Corp, with their xAI-Bot web scrapers.
hoshi73•about 3 hours ago
It's insane that their sign-up process now requires a phone number to complete on the web, and even basic features like playing a video in a tweet recently stopped working on x.com without an account. (In the past, searching for tweets, looking at an account's entire timeline, etc., never required logging in at all.)
cbeach•about 3 hours ago
It's not insane if you're trying to build a social network without bots and foreign interference.
jdiff•about 3 hours ago
But Twitter has and embraces that. The bots are all verified. Go on any tweet that mentions crypto or "my friends account got hacked" and dive into the deep well of hidden tweets.

Hiding tweets for users without accounts does absolutely nothing for either of those goals.

cbeach•about 3 hours ago
X.com makes it nearly impossible to run bot accounts, with its phone number per account requirement, and the astronomical fees for using its API.

Twitter, by comparison, was trivially easy to run bots on. I ran many automated Twitter accounts (for legit purposes). I had to shut them all down when Musk bought Twitter.

pibaker•about 3 hours ago
Whenever Meta is mentioned on HN, there will be HN users asking why people are still on Facebook or Instagram when we all know Meta hired psychology PHDs to make their products addictive yadda yadda. Usually you will just see people tell each other that they have gotten off Facebook before it became uncool. You hardly see anyone accusing each other of virtue signaling or having any kind of political slant.

But Twitter or X comes up, someone will say they don't use it, and people will start calling out their supposed virtue signaling and making wild speculations about their politics in no time.

Why?

happytoexplain•about 3 hours ago
Edit: OK, I think I see your question.

Elon is much more explicitly/publicly on one side of US politics than Meta is. That's why people accuse his critics of playing politics (a convenient scapegoat).

numpad0•about 3 hours ago
Musk and his supporters project a lot. They have some neural condition or notoriety as popularity strategy or something that makes him/them hate everything, and they performatively state that "___ hates Elon"(often verbatim) out of that. It's not exactly organic.
zamadatix•about 1 hour ago
I've never really noticed a difference in the trends for either. For the most part, all of the comments are about how anywhere but HN is complete shit and even HN is not as good as it used to be. There are always a few saying "but that's where everyone is". Inevitably, someone will post a link to something we all hate on constantly, be it one of these kinds of sites or a paywalled news article or whatever, and we're all just supposed to either know the currently working proxy or hope someone has already posted the link in the comments.

One thing I have universally noticed is it doesn't matter what it is or how many sides there are to it, someone always thinks HN is unfair to one side in favor of another. Usually multiple someone at the same time, and usually not even from the opposing side as each other claims.

And I don't know, maybe there is an 80/20 bias or something. I just don't know how I would or wouldn't reliably know that on intuition/things I notice rather than running the numbers on comment data.

joshdavham•about 3 hours ago
Regardless of the outcome, I’m very thankful for xcancel and all the excellent work they’ve done.

I wish them the best in the legal fight!

sea-gold•about 5 hours ago
tomhow•about 1 hour ago
Comments moved thither. Thanks!
w-ll•about 2 hours ago
The other day in the bay there was an amber alert. it had a bit.ly link which opened up twitter (or i guess x) app. that wouldnt let me see the alert unless i logged in.
inatreecrown2•about 3 hours ago
X is really a bad joke with their "Public Town Square".

"Gated Community" is a much better description, but I guess that doesn't sound so cool.

thataccount•about 3 hours ago
Elon was more or less made in environments where the informational flow was free. I'm not sure what he thinks he's doing with all this.
Advertisement
trompetenaccoun•about 2 hours ago
First Instagram and Facebook, then Reddit, now Twitter. This is the new normal, paywalls and walled gardens everywhere. Not to get started on quickly increasing nation-state censorship and trail blazers such as China with the entirety of their national web locked down already.
rustcleaner•about 2 hours ago
We move to the fediverse, hyphanet, etc, and leave the normies in the slop shops. We build a high information quality environment for us which is not easily centralize-able or lockin-able, and eventually the slop shops fall due to the lack of our high quality communications. Enshittification will ensure the slop shops' ultimate failure in their futures.
senderista•about 2 hours ago
well I guess I won't be reading anything on that hellsite anymore
Trung0246•about 2 hours ago
In the meanwhile for anyone that have android, use QuaX (still requires account)
huebnerob•about 2 hours ago
Sad, if inevitable.
mmooss•about 2 hours ago
I wonder why X waited until now to send cease and desist letters. I assumed the issue was resolved somehow - maybe they were unenforceable - long ago.

I'm also surprised they don't already have their response prepared to this inevitable event, though maybe they are just seeking to fine-tune it.

altcognito•about 3 hours ago
Wait until Musk discovers that without these additional services, people will care even less about what happens there.
overfeed•about 3 hours ago
Perhaps the ability to de-anonymize[1] users and algorithmically influence those remaining is more valuable to him than whatever ARPU is for Twitter, especially with significant elections coming up around thr world.

1. A lot of data vendors key information on phone numbers or email, that's why all rewards program are thirsty for it.

ButlerianJihad•about 3 hours ago
EST, huh? Where is this poster located that they are in an Eastern Standard Time zone?
MBCook•about 3 hours ago
The US east coast?
nightpool•about 3 hours ago
No, the East Coast observes EDT until November
rsstack•about 3 hours ago
Many humans write EST in the summer.
SoftTalker•about 3 hours ago
EST is valid year-round, if specified.
droptablemain•about 4 hours ago
What's the point of such a service? It sounds like performative nonsense.
sandcat_•about 3 hours ago
Others have explained about not being able to see all content, profiles and such.

I’ll add another reason why I redirect to it: XCancel is/was a lot faster than X and had IMO a much cleaner UI, especially when reading larger conversations or groups of tweets. I don’t browse X much, but I already have an extension installed to redirect certain sites, so adding a redirect was an easy win. I’ll miss it.

afavour•about 3 hours ago
Do you make the same complaint when folks post links to archive.is? If not, why is this different?
ihuman•about 1 hour ago
I use it to make RSS feeds for accounts where I don't want to miss a single post
fauchletenerum•about 2 hours ago
If you read the comments on the Github issue for Nitter shutting down you'll see that's precisely what it is
Kim_Bruning•about 1 hour ago
Odd. Try to read stuff on twitter without an account/logged out.

It's a kind of enshittification pattern where a site based on user content closes off more and more access over time.

Xcancel and Nitter are/were easier to work with, afaict.

It's mostly useful if you want to link someone to a post on twitter to people who don't have an twitter account.

Petersipoi•about 3 hours ago
That is the point. It's a way to get the value of a service you don't like, while signaling to everyone that you're too virtuous to use the service you're getting value out of.
lern_too_spel•about 3 hours ago
I prefer not to share links that require the people receiving the link to create an account to read the content and it's replies or post to such websites for that matter. That's basic netiquette.
fuzzzerd•43 minutes ago
Same, and I'm learning that we're definitely a minority.
numpad0•about 3 hours ago
So that's supposed to be the motive? Frankly I think most users just see it as a path of least resistance to a tweet. You guys really aren't familiar with this Internet thing.
xvxvx•about 4 hours ago
You need an account to access X. Change the URL to xcancel and you can view these accounts.

It also looks like X requires a Google or Apple account to sign up if you don’t use your phone number. I’m not linking any of that to the X cesspool.

droptablemain•about 3 hours ago
You do not need an account to access specific X posts/tweets. You do need an account to read all replies.
pessimizer•about 3 hours ago
You need to be linked to specific tweets to know where they are. You can't just open up a timeline and read more than the last few posts (literally like 5, including any pinned post.)
behole•about 4 hours ago
You are referring to X/Twitter right?