The law won't save us from Meta's 'pervert glasses' The only solution is mockery

66LLvveMx2koXfwn about 3 hours ago 5 commentsRead Article on theguardian.com

DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 100 words in the discussion.

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

panny•about 3 hours ago

Why is it only perverted when we film each other? Not when those black dome cameras film us at a store or restaurant or a flock camera films us on the road?

GuestFAUniverse•about 3 hours ago

It's all perverted. I grew up in a world that worked without it. Suddenly some perverts see it as a necessity.

GenericDev•about 3 hours ago

They're both pervert cameras. This is not mutually exclusive.

The need for surveillance capitalism is a perversion of privacy which has been previously tolerated because the scope of their encroachment was in the context of closed circuit recording that don't persist long.

Pervert glasses are awful because their scope is greatly increased, with no localization of tolerated behavior.

No one wants to be filmed.

apothegm•about 2 hours ago

“Need”?

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF•about 1 hour ago

Not that surveillance capitalism is needed by society, but that surveillance capitalism needs privacy violations in order to thrive.