DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
30% Positive
Analyzed from 737 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#flock#cameras#data#state#alprs#plate#need#alpr#where#here

Discussion (26 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
In my view, that’s one of the better reasons to have ALPRs at all, but you do need strict controls to prevent misuse.
It's one page: https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/defaul...
Very first paragraph. "Flock" is basically being used like "Kleenex" here
Kinda sad since even though NYC was always iffy, it was never flat out as useless as it is now.
now they said they didn't sell their data to LEOs but their founders also literally used to work for the CIA (it was bragged about in the initial interviews)
I wouldn't be surprised if companies of that kind are a dime-a-dozen
I ask rhetorically but I also imagine that at some point there will be an app that tells you and then people will vote with their dollars to the places that don't have them.
Price sensitive folks going to dollar general, wal-mart, etc., are not going to go shop at whole foods (assuming they even differentiate), and for people who go to ikea or Lowe’s for home goods, it’s not like they’re going to drive 30 miles out of their way to avoid ALPRs.
We can get pols to not deploy them with public monies, but I think that’s all we can do.
Playing whack-a-mole with each specific type of surveillance and company involved isn't really fixing the issue.