Show HN: Weedout – Safari extension that hides YouTube AI-labeled videos

mmasteranza about 9 hours ago 39 commentsRead Article on masteranza.github.io

DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

I'm the developer. I built this because AI-generated conspiracy videos were getting out of control in my own YouTube feed. Weedout is a $1.99 Safari extension for macOS that removes videos YouTube labels “Made with AI” from feed, search, related videos, playlists and Shorts. It uses YouTube's label rather than AI detection, runs locally, and does not catch unlabeled videos.

Source for developers who want to fork or build: https://github.com/masteranza/weedout-for-youtube

Pull requests are not accepted; the repository is for independent forks.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

45% Positive

Analyzed from 1183 words in the discussion.

Discussion (39 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

tartoran•about 2 hours ago

This is great and hope it'll be compatible with more and more browsers.

This should be done by youtube themselves. It's so simple for them to label AI generated content so people can either look for it or avoid it but they won't do it. I'm not sure how they profit from AI gen videos over regular videos...

I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts but there's no way to do it, it's like that by design, Youtube want to shove those in your face so you click on it, even if by accident. Luckily I found a free app to do it (IOS). I absolutely appreciate the effort people put into fighting these companies back.

ultrarunner•about 2 hours ago

Shouldn't their presumably unlimited access to Gemini models enable them to implement things like this quickly and easily?

MarioMan•about 4 hours ago

This is great. Having the option to choose whether or not to see AI content was the first thing I hoped they'd add a filter for when it was first introduced.

Just for kicks, I inverted the filter in a TamperMoneky script that only keeps the AI-generated content: https://gist.github.com/SMarioMan/32c959d79035cb421df1c69c06...

consumer451•about 5 hours ago

My only concern is that I have seen legit videos by creators on the platform for many years, with the tiny "AI (i)" label below the video. I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.

You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.

onion2k•about 1 hour ago

I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.

The AI logo doesn't mean "entirely made with AI". It means "significant use of AI detected". If someone uses AI to modify the background of their video (say, to remove a detail) it'll get the label.

userbinator•about 2 hours ago

There are tons of human-generated videos on YouTube that aren't worth watching either, and usually can be identified by "screamer" thumbnails and vapid clickbaity titles. I don't think we need to amplify another divisive topic.

ungreased0675•about 7 hours ago

I’d love a small local model that detects AI voices and blocks the content.

Suppafly•about 1 hour ago

I'm not even sure you'd need AI for that, there are only like 3 voices that are ever used.

karim79•about 5 hours ago

My pet peeve is the AI generated voices. I absolutely love the cosmology-astrophysics-space stuff. And it can be any crap if it's correct enough and entertaining enough and passive enough that I can fall asleep to it.

But once I detect that the voiceover is AI generated that shit get instablocked forever. It's an instant put-off. Do all the visuals you want with AI as long as they are reasonable but when a human (AI) voice starts to fuck with the way a word has been presented in a particular context then it just makes me want to hate everything I won't mention any names <cough> elevenlabs.

mrweasel•27 minutes ago

Many content creators on YouTube may not have English as their first language, so they turn to AI to do the voice over. The thing is, I'd rather listen to broken English read by a human than an AI voice over. The AI voices are off putting and tiresome. It's somehow hurts my brain less trying to process a Chinese person speak bad English. Alternatively for something like YouTube, add subtitles and just speak your own language is much more comfortable than the AI voice-overs.

thatmf•about 8 hours ago

I wish I had this but for every website and media surface

masteranza•about 8 hours ago

Well, AI flags this content so it's an easy target without heuristics - that's why I've started there.

embedding-shape•about 8 hours ago

Ironically, if you had this for every website, including GitHub and HN, you wouldn't have seen this HN submission / repository :)

masteranza•about 8 hours ago

That's also true, you gotta fight fire with fire :)

mikeweiss•about 7 hours ago

Need the EU, or California or some other large jurisdiction to create a law requiring identifying labels on all AI content

lukeasch21•about 8 hours ago

This is great, but why start with Safari and not a cross platform browser? Is there something native here that can't be done otherwise or is it just personal preference?

masteranza•about 7 hours ago

There's plenty of AI blocking Chrome extensions already, however I prefer Safari for personal stuff (and hence YouTube too) and use Brave for Google-gated work related stuff.

Schnitz•about 7 hours ago

I’ve found that the AI label doesn’t necessarily mean AI slop, it just means there’s a non zero amount of AI in the video. I want to avoid AI slop but not all videos that have an AI title screen or whatever.

conmod278•about 1 hour ago

People think all AI is bad. AI in the hands of expert can create wonders. Take a look below.

Oneiric | AI Sci-Fi Short Film | Higgsfield Originals (2026)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAg9iDh9_BQ

AI is replacing me by kold

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGoFUxCmBdA

f3408fh•about 6 hours ago

Yep, it's super useless. The label is so general. Was AI used for one image in the 10 minute video? Is the voiceover AI? Is the entirety of it generated with AI? No way to know.

AmazingEveryDay•about 5 hours ago

Agreed. I think instead of "AI or not", that something more nuanced is needed - perhaps a rating system inspired by the MPAA's (g, pg, pg-13 r, nc-17, x) that is used for movies.

arcfour•about 4 hours ago

Yeah, I make song remixes in the style of a particular video game and while the music is completely human written (by me), I'll often have AI generated or edit the "cover art" for me so people have something to look at/chuckle at.

These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(

PixelForg•about 2 hours ago

> however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(

Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)

arcfour•about 1 hour ago

What's the difference between me pasting a face over a body in GIMP manually and me prompting an LLM to make the same edit, faster, and better than I would by hand? They aren't particularly high-effort. The artwork isn't really the point, but I can't just upload a black video...

tadfisher•about 6 hours ago

Now that the AI label exists, the creators using AI for an intro graphic or background music are probably going to stop using it.

Muskwalker•about 4 hours ago

For a creator posting a video, Google gives specific guidelines on whether to tag it as AI:

"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?

- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do

- Alters footage of a real event or place

- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur

To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"

So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.

masteranza•about 1 hour ago

If so, that’s indeed a real concern...

altairprime•about 3 hours ago

Google’s been pushing creators to use AI thumbnails more heavily since right around the EU deadline for labeling, presumably in the hopes of saturating the label so that everyone burns out and eats their slop quietly.

vivzkestrel•about 2 hours ago

- stupid question: how does this sort of thing work?

- like how do you actually determine if a video was AI made or not?

- what is the algorithm used? what is the threshold for a video to be considered slop?

- what do you do? download the videos with yt-dlp split them into frames and run each frame by what?

ffsm8•about 2 hours ago

From the pitch itself

> Weedout is a $1.99 Safari extension for macOS that removes videos YouTube labels “Made with AI”

So no, none of that. Blows my mind if someone pays for that

singpolyma3•about 8 hours ago

I'm more concerned about the stuff that is fraudulent then possibly legit stuff explicitly labelled as AI

masteranza•about 8 hours ago

True, but that's a way harder problem to solve. For me what was important was reducing the noise as much as possible as fast as possible consistently. Youtube algorithms has been pervasive enough that anything that moves the scale down even a little bit was worth the effort.

ranger_danger•about 8 hours ago

You can charge money for browser extensions? And people pay for them?

I'm in the wrong business.

masteranza•about 8 hours ago

It's free on GitHub for anyone to build, use or fork. I've built it for myself, but going through App Store submissions took me 2x the time, hence the price.

0x1d7•about 6 hours ago

They require signing which is $100/year.

https://support.apple.com/guide/security/app-code-signing-pr...

negura•about 4 hours ago

This is what they mean when they say AI amplifies inequality. If you're technically competent, you just write yourself an extension to block the slop spam, or at least pay to install one. So in the end it's rotting much more the brains of the least prepared.

dathinab•about 7 hours ago

one problem is that algorithms(1) to detect AI generated content are surprisingly bad

like non-AI generated animated/cartoon content is much more likely to be mistakenly labeled as AI then some somewhat realistic "looking" but for a human still clearly AI slop content

some platforms (TickTock) seem to label anything as fully AI generated iff the metadata indicates certain tools like Adobe Illustrator are used, independent on how it was been used

---

(1): If that tool is "ask an AI" then its not surprising at all. It's content which AI tried to make look as realistic as possible, the same (and potentially similar) AI will see it as "as realistic as possible"...

gregjw•about 7 hours ago

Safari? Of all browsers? Why not start with Chromium?