DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 340 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#more#anthropic#subscriptions#kimi#everyone#models#closer#openai#api#developers

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
But then I compare it to my $200/month subscription - which I believe is how most developers are actually using these - and it actually looks way more expensive from my quick calculations.
Has anyone else calculated it? Is there any way to get Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 Max at a similar cost to what we're all paying by subscription for Claude or Codex?
If not, I'd push back and say these Chinese models are actually more expensive, for most developers.
These subscriptions look far more limited and possibly also more expensive than the equivalent Claude/Codex ones at similar prices.
https://www.kimi.ai/resources/kimi-k3-pricing
https://www.alibabacloud.com/en/campaign/ai-landing-page-tok...
For example, GLM5.3-flash runs slightly slower than Qwen3.8-Next-Flash but uses fewer tokens to think and thus finishes tasks faster overall.
On top of that we have complications like Anthropic apparently being extremely misleading about what the 20x plan really means (it isn't 20x the weekly limit of the base plan). I would not be surprised if everyone's doing something manipulative like that. The constant changes to promotional periods, frequent limit resets, harness updates etc make this even more difficult.
Do you have any source for that?
https://x.com/Alibaba_Qwen/status/2094968708288680276