Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 826 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#uber#driver#taxis#ride#indrive#price#countries#taxi#lot#pay

Discussion (35 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jhogervorst•about 2 hours ago
According to some people on X, they shut down immediately, while rides were still active. Sounds like an unplanned (and quite crazy) action.

https://x.com/gergelyorosz/status/2095256757178188113

embedding-shape•about 2 hours ago
Given Uber is one of the few companies who are lucky enough to have a separate page for all the controversies on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Uber), they also have their own fair of experience with police raids on their offices. They've also used "‘kill switch’ during raids to stop police seeing data" (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/10/uber-files-leak...) before, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was some sort of legal "kill switch" or whatever that got triggered, so they can get rid of everything faster.
bossyTeacher•about 1 hour ago
> They've also used "‘kill switch’ during raids to stop police seeing data

If Uber wasn't a VC backed company, they would have been charged with destruction of evidence or similar.

minraws•23 minutes ago
They likely were but Companies don't go to jail they pay fines
1970-01-01•about 1 hour ago
This is hilarious. They are legally kidnappers at this point. No reason to even stop the ride and let you get out for free.
tristanj•about 2 hours ago
Makes sense, Uber's 30-50% cut is far too much. How can they compete with inDrive which only takes 10%. And on inDrive you set your own fare.

Rides are 20-40% cheaper elsewhere, why would anyone pay extra for Uber?

Loughla•about 1 hour ago
I would pay extra because I don't want the cognitive load of haggling on the cost. When I want/need A ride, it's because I'm either overloaded, away from home, or drunk. These are three times that I didn't want to bother with any more nonsense.
samrus•about 1 hour ago
Its not that much. And you can just bypass it by accepting the first offer you get
bdangubic•about 1 hour ago
haggling when drunk is super fun
mythrwy•42 minutes ago
but haggling with drunks is not
blovescoffee•about 1 hour ago
One anecdote for a datapoint: Not sure if it's better now but I've lost a phone in an InDrive and I've lost an expensive bag in an Uber and it was significantly easier and less sketchy to get the bag back. I'm not a price sensitive rider so the insurance of a reputable 'comfort' tier Uber driver paid off. The InDrive driver made me get another ride to him then demanded $1000mxn (~$55usd) to return my phone. The Uber app had me pay ~$250mxn if I remember correctly and the driver promptly returned the bag.
tristanj•35 minutes ago
I have a controversial take: outside the US/Europe, Uber is mostly a tourist app.

If you actually live in developing regions:

1) your income is much lower, and you are quite price sensitive. The Uber price premium (20-40%) hits much harder.

2) the Uber alternatives are noticeably cheaper for the exact same trip.

Regarding your experience, if you were local, that inDrive driver likely would not have tried to extort $1000 MXN out of you. They saw you were a visitor and took advantage of you.

In Nigeria or Uganda there are few tourists, so Uber cannot rely on a stream of price-insensitive travelers to fill their cars. It makes total sense why they struggled in (and gave up on) the local market there.

mvdtnz•24 minutes ago
Your take isn't controversial, it's just wrong. And you seem to be implying everywhere outside of USA and Europe is a developing region?
croes•13 minutes ago
Could simply be because it’s a phone which nowadays is a considered bigger loss than a bag means bigger chance of extorting money to give it back.
itsamario•15 minutes ago
Insurance goes up. Who knows how much liability they need to cover transportation. They likely deal with claims of being kidnapped or held hostage by driver on a regular basis.
Razengan•12 minutes ago
Man in some of the shitty countries I've had the misfortune of living in, taxi drivers were outright predatory and sometimes downright hostile. Uber was a godsend in such environments.
486sx33•about 2 hours ago
30% is fair. Don’t like it start a cab company
alephnerd•about 2 hours ago
Bolt (the CEE ridesharing app) is the primary player in Nigeria. In Uganda it's primarily a bunch of local startups.
swimminglala88•about 2 hours ago
why they do that
tristanj•about 1 hour ago
In developing countries, the taxi market is largely unregulated and Uber faces actual competition. Uber cannot compete on price in these regions.
wolvoleo•about 1 hour ago
Even in countries where taxis are regulated, sometimes Uber is more expensive but safer. Like in Romania. When I used to go there a lot the official taxis were mandated to offer such low standardized rates that there was a lot of scamming going on. One of my colleagues was basically abducted by a taxi driver (taken to a dangerous gypsy area and told they would kick him out of the car unless he paid them hundreds of euro). Uber was a lot safer because you have tracability on the driver, but more expensive too. And there weren't a lot of them.

There were ways to get safe drivers in some cases by booking them through the yellow machines. But in the end the company hired private drivers for us. Though personally I would just use the metro and tram a lot too :P If you know where you're going it's not a dangerous place.

Not sure if the taxi situation is still as bad there by the way. I would hope not.

noeltock•37 minutes ago
Even in Ukraine, it's far more expensive than the local equivalent which works flawlessly.
chermi•about 1 hour ago
Does no one have any memory of what taxis were like and how much they cost? The taxis are gone because they weren't competitive.
SoftTalker•18 minutes ago
And taxis weren't competitive because they were heavily regulated in most markets by a medallion system that artificially kept the supply low.
bdangubic•41 minutes ago
taxis “weren’t competitive” when Uber rides were heavily subsidized and Uber was burning billions. I ride taxi now exclusively because it is almost always cheaper than Uber
ttoinou•about 1 hour ago
Counterpoint : in Portugal they are regulated under TVDE, and Uber is competitive with Bolt
aleksandrm•40 minutes ago
That's not a counterpoint.
aleksandrm•41 minutes ago
In other words Uber did not bribe the politicians enough in their favor, market was not favorable for them, so they exited.
PunchyHamster•about 1 hour ago
their only leg up in 1st world countries was largely going around any laws governing taxis
tristanj•about 1 hour ago
I disagree, that was only true 15 years ago. In developed countries, ride hailing is highly regulated. Uber is one of the few companies willing to implement all the required regulations.
mvdtnz•23 minutes ago
Read the article to find out.
hduto•about 2 hours ago
Driving for Uber in Lagos I suspect has to be very challenging