Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

20% Positive

Analyzed from 490 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#data#human#government#training#contractors#weights#text#using#openai#makes

Discussion (44 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jrflo•about 3 hours ago
Clickbait title, they fired contractors for using AI to label data, which defeats the purpose of labeling data in this case.
in_absentia•about 3 hours ago
So OpenAI is not a believer in recursive self-improvement after all?
jrflo•about 3 hours ago
Read the article, that's not what this is about. Title is clickbait, they fired contractors for using AI to label data when the whole point of labeling data is to distill human knowledge into weights, not distill weights into weights.
in_absentia•about 3 hours ago
You're replying to a joke, and yes, that's all it's about. For all the tales of rapid self-improvement, all labs are real careful not to taint their precious training sets with anything that comes out of their systems. Website reputation modeling, fingerprints in generated text, firing contractors that rely on AI.

I've been told on HN about a year ago that the era of scraping is over and that it's all AI-training-AI now. My web server logs and stories like that disagree.

pfortuny•about 3 hours ago
That is exactly what "training AI" needs: labeled data.
beepbooptheory•about 3 hours ago
[delayed]
liquicity•about 3 hours ago
They’re a believer, but they won’t be paying third parties for that once it becomes feasible
gadders•about 3 hours ago
I think people want the service they are paying for.
hmokiguess•about 3 hours ago
Makes sense, they are buying distillation of human brains not their own weights.
arceister•about 3 hours ago
yo dawg
chihuahua•about 2 hours ago
I heard you like AI
wpasc•about 3 hours ago
pimp my agent
jakozaur•about 3 hours ago
Typically, for AI training, you need human feedback. If AI were enough, then OpenAI would do it themselves. Though we all know how bad AI slop is, running it in a loop can lead to unreadable sentences.

They hired contractors on the condition that they provide human feedback without AI; those people broke the rules, so their contracts ended prematurely.

Not sure why this is news uncovered by an investigative journalist.

dgellow•about 3 hours ago
How is it a failure of journalistic understanding? They seem to say pretty much the same as you
fwlr•about 3 hours ago
“Suppose the government puts a certain drug in the water supply … A couple of conspiracy nuts say it makes your fingers fall off one by one, but the government says that’s ridiculous … However, government employees are all observed drinking bottled water exclusively, and if anyone suggests that government employees might also want to take the completely innocuous drug, they freak out … If by chance you manage to slip a little bit of tap water into a government employee’s drink, and he finds out about it, he runs around shrieking like a banshee and occasionally yelling “AAAAAAH! MY FINGERS! MY PRECIOUS FINGERS!”. At some point you might start to wonder whether the government was being entirely honest with you.”

What is it, exactly, that makes AI-generated text so poisonous to AIs but totally harmless to humans? What is mode/model collapse, and why can it only happen to AIs with too much AI text in their training data and not to, say, human students with too much AI text in their textbooks? The people who know the most about this phenomenon seem much more careful about contamination than they are encouraging us to be.

yunwal•about 3 hours ago
I don't think anyone is saying it's poisonous here? The people were hired to do a job and they didn't do it. Feels like you're being disingenuous, if there's one thing i know about AI employees, it's that they use LLMs, like, all the time.
VCFundedGenYer•about 3 hours ago
Bubble bursting behavior in action - AI company that pushes everyone to use AI, replace everything and everyone with AI, fires people for using AI to make the AI.

The more you think about it, the worse it gets.

dgellow•about 3 hours ago
Earlier this year it was so dissonant to see so many companies explaining how they are going to replace their engineers with AI from both OpenAI and Anthropic, while both companies were instead (and are still) hiring all the human talent they could