DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
67% Positive
Analyzed from 268 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#humans#complexity#should#improvements#maths#doing#seems#used#doesn#practical

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
This seems to imply that they used Claude Opus 5.5 before it was released on September 22nd.
I think a reasonable conclusion now that AI is getting better than us humans at this, is that humans should stop doing this. I think there are strong reasons that humans should never have been doing this in the past but now it’s far more clear, AI will out complicate whatever complexity you can build and then beat at you at its handling of intricate complexity.
Humans should focus on finding simple solutions that lead to a 10X improvement. AI rarely does this, though I have noticed it some times doing this in maths, but this was the case when the solution was already present in some distant literature and no human had the expertise in 2 distant areas to make the connection. When AI does this, it is a welcome advancement, and hopefully the bridge it shows leads to exciting new developments.
But LLMs rarely do this, and I think humans should exclusively focus on this, because it seems like we are far better than LLMs at keeping things simple and finding new insights that leads to 10X, 100X improvements