Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 157 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#latency#jev#network#actually#model#https#com#clm#matter#typesafe

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

eadwu•about 1 hour ago
Does the latency even matter?

You're comparing a local GPU to network hops? Wouldn't be surprised if Jev was actually similar in runtime and their is just a great deal of network latency.

The evaluation is quite interesting though - I'd actually say the raw answer is correct in the absence of detail and prior knowledge (Who wrote the play Romeo and Juliet).

brookman64k•4 minutes ago
I tried TypeSafe’s Jev playground. It outputs the model latency and network latency separately. The model latency was 100-200ms in my tests.
r0x0r007•about 1 hour ago
what's with that dino run? Jev is slow but it jumps correctly, their model always touches the cactus or whatever it is...I am guessing it doesn't matter? Or does it?
in-silico•about 3 hours ago
I wonder when work started on this project, and how the public release of Jev played into their timing.
rahimnathwani•about 3 hours ago
From a tweet:

https://x.com/jackyk02/status/2102947585208258799?s=20

  I actually explored this for robotics last year, and CLM grew directly out of that work a few months ago. Feel free to check out my earlier post for more details on how CLM could be applied to robotics:
  https://x.com/jackyk02/status/2026368947210289660
But of course the repo with the TypeSafe compatible API is new: https://github.com/Contrastive-LM/CLM