Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

71% Positive

Analyzed from 1798 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#car#more#cheaper#evs#still#expensive#cars#charging#costs#fuel

Discussion (74 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

silverFork•about 1 hour ago
Technically EVs should be cheaper to build too but we are not there yet because the designs and battery blue prints are still too new..
thelastgallon•about 1 hour ago
Going through the comments, it looks like people in UK hate EVs. This is surprising, because the anti-EV arguments are mostly seen only in US (which is understandable, US is first and foremost a fossil fuel country).

All cars need parking and real-estate is wasted for parking at a humongous expense. Cars are next to some building. Usually, in most countries all building have electricity. UK has 230V, which means any outlet anywhere should work. All it needs is a cable from the nearest building to where the car is parked.

prmoustache•44 minutes ago
> All it needs is a cable from the nearest building to where the car is parked.

In many places, you don't have the luxury to park in front of your house and you don't have the liberty to open random doors and plug your cars to whatever outlet is available there.

chaz6•about 1 hour ago
There are a lot of places in the UK where you do not have the facility to charge your car at home (terraced houses, apartment buildings with no parking spaces). Running cables to buildings is risky. Even where there are houses that have a road in front of the front door, there is no guarantee that the owner is able to park in front.
cmiles8•about 4 hours ago
Headline is misleading. Cheaper on per-mile operating costs but typically more expensive to purchase and insure. There’s also a nasty depreciation curve to contend with. Nobody wants a 10 year old Tesla, but a 10 year old well mentioned petrol car still has a ton of life left in it.

It still often ends up a bit cheaper across comparable vehicles but not a slam dunk and nowhere near as good as the headline suggests.

jillesvangurp•about 3 hours ago
> typically more expensive to purchase and insure

The cheapest car for sale in the UK is an EV at this point. The market is rapidly filling with EVs in essentially all price segments. Most EVs are still under warranty when they hit the second hand market for the simple reason most EVs on the market were produced in their typical warranty period.

stinos•about 3 hours ago
Headline is misleading

Honest question: how else would one interpret 'cheaper to drive', if not 'cheaper per-mile operating costs'? Wouldn't they have used plain 'cheaper than' if they would have meant 'purchase+operating'?

cmiles8•about 3 hours ago
Because driving includes a lot more costs than just fuel. And as others are calling out, nobody wants a used EV so deprecation is a real cost to every day regardless of if the car is driven or not.
neilalexander•about 3 hours ago
I think "nobody wants a used EV" will change, there is already a growing amount of evidence that battery deterioration is nowhere near as bad as feared on average. ICE vehicles also tend to get less efficient over time as well due to wear and tear, build-up, degrading sensors etc, it's just that nobody talks about that.
bArray•about 3 hours ago
> There’s also a nasty depreciation curve to contend with. Nobody wants a 10 year old Tesla, but a 10 year old well mentioned petrol car still has a ton of life left in it.

It's worse, there's almost no second hand market for the vehicles. There is barely anybody trained to repair them (even if they will sell you the parts) and if they are crashed significantly it's almost always a write-off.

> It still often ends up a bit cheaper across comparable vehicles but not a slam dunk and nowhere near as good as the headline suggests.

Only because of government meddling. Fuel is almost uniquely taxed 3 times, which pays for subsidies to pay for green energy initiatives.

I think I'll hold out with my diesels and petrols and see how this all goes.

pwagland•about 4 hours ago
Depends on the specific car, Tesla's are notoriously expensive to insure, but I believe that the Volkswagen ID series is much more reasonable.
cmiles8•about 3 hours ago
They’re extremely expensive to repair for one, which drives up the rates since many are just written off after relatively minor accidents.
pornel•about 3 hours ago
10-year old Teslas are great, you just need a sticker "bought before Elon went crazy".
spiclk•about 4 hours ago
Hopefully the article authors are only attempting to reach their target audience, but please don't encourage numerical illiteracy!

One-tenth the (fuel) cost, or 90% cheaper.

(That is, if you own a house with off-street parking).

cloudie78•about 4 hours ago
Good, can’t wait to see what fertiliser and heating costs will be.

All it took was destruction of global energy markets and supplies.

Let’s celebrate!

phtrivier•about 3 hours ago
Meta: As plenty of commenters have pointed out, this kind of statements (and similar ones like "PV electricity is the cheapest one", etc...) are entirely true _with some attached caveats_.

For example, an EV is both undoubtably cheaper to operate than a gas powered car ; and infinitely more expensive to operate if you can't afford to buy one in the first place.

Similarly, the price of kWh of PV-generated electricity is both lower than pretty much everything else as this point ; and, basically infinite when the sun is down and your 4h battery has run out.

Is there a proper math concept to fairly express those things ? "Mean", "Average" or "Median" fall short. Mean with very very large error bars ? "Average with substitution" ?

In the end, I can't wait for all those circumvoltions to be irrelevant (when EVs are just cheap to buy too, and electricity has enough storage to bake it into the price, etc...)

jacobp100•about 3 hours ago
I live in the UK and own an EV and this article is misleading in how they get the 90% figure. All off peak charging tariffs in the UK have higher peak energy charges than their flat tariffs - so you make your EV charging cheaper at the expense of higher energy costs elsewhere. For me it’s about break even assuming 6k miles per year.

Also, if you do not have a home charger, you are very unlikely to come out cheaper than petrol. I think 40p/kwh is about the breakeven

buggeryorkshire•about 3 hours ago
True. But we load shift to the cheap period things like the washing machine, dryer and dishwasher. We have an old 5 bed house - currently eon reckon our bill for the month is about ÂŁ50.
piltdownman•about 2 hours ago
I mean the maths is simple enough if you round up.

ICE @ 40 MPG: ~22.6p per mile for diesel EV: ~3p per mile for off-peak home charging.

The difference from 23 to 3 is a decrease of 20, which is an 86.96% decrease.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/sep/28/price-of-diese...

ghusto•about 3 hours ago
Once they factor in my current budget for buying a car which is up to ÂŁ2,000, insurance around ÂŁ70pm, (relatively) inexpensive repairs and ease of finding spare parts/mechanics, we can talk.

All this kind of spin does is turn people who were on the fence, off electric. Just treat people like adults and say "whilst there are still lots of reasons to prefer a traditional car, electrics are the future, and here's something that shows the progress".

thelastgallon•about 3 hours ago
Could be worded better. Maybe say petrol is 10 times costlier? Multiplication is a lot quicker than division.
r721•about 3 hours ago
Zadak•about 4 hours ago
What about the infrastructure? It always comes to this for any country, sadly.
neilalexander•about 3 hours ago
There are over 120,000 public charging points across the UK, with over 25,000 of them being 50kW+ DC. That's averaging more than one charger per square mile of the mainland UK (density distribution of course varies).
Advertisement
roschdal•about 4 hours ago
Electric cars (Tesla+) are much more expensive than gasoline cars to purchase initially.
pwagland•about 4 hours ago
This depends on country, and what you consider to be a comparable car.

If we compare, for example, the Tesla Model 3 (RWD) against the BMW 3 series (320i), then we get:

NL: Model 3 ~€36K vs 3 series ~€50K UK: Model 3 ~£37K vs 3 series ~£41K

In both countries the Model 3 is more expensive than that the 3 series.

Second hand the maths can change again, since EVs typically depreciate faster, due to battery degradation fears, and the fact that range on newer cars is always improving, but still, typically for a four year old version of the above, the Model 3 is still cheaper than the 3 series.

There is, of course, the discussion on whether it is fair to compare a model 3 with the 3 series, but it is often used, so I'll go with it.

If you want to compare cheaper cars, then you could compare a Ford Focus with an MG4 EV, and in the UK the EV wins, in NL, the Gasoline car wins, but in both cases, they are more price comparable.

Fred27•about 4 hours ago
Are they? An equivalent model don't seem to be significantly more new, and you can now get some great deals on secondhand EVs.

I'm in the UK and have now gone completely electric - motorbike (Zero SRF), car (wife's Model 3) and van (ID Buzz). To be honest though, that was mostly because I like EVs - yes, even the motorbike. The fuel costs are just a bonus.

EliRivers•about 4 hours ago
Well what if rather than a Tesla+, one bought a cheaper EV instead? In the UK, the Leapmotor T03 seems to go for around 16000 GBP new. That's actually not much more than an equivalent petrol car.
dv_dt•about 3 hours ago
Has the UK decided to block or add protectionist regulations to Chinese EV imports?
ksec•about 3 hours ago
No, at least not yet. It was one of the issues when discussing with EU, as they were worried those EV will get routed through UK to EU without tariff.
Ekaros•about 4 hours ago
Not to forget greater depreciation. So for those who drive relatively little the ICE card might still have lower total cost of ownership. Not to forget time comparison on fuelling versus charging.
pornel•about 3 hours ago
When you buy used, the depreciation works in your favour.

You can get a mint condition IONIQ 5 with 300bhp and 20-minute charging for less than a new Corolla.

earthnail•about 4 hours ago
I would bet that this is different for cars made in the last 3-4 years. More and more stats from the automobile clubs are rolling in that show that electric vehicles last much longer, because they have less moving parts, and that batteries last much longer than expected.

So as of today, I’d certainly buy electric if I was worried about depreciation.

Ekaros•about 3 hours ago
It is not like normal cars don't already last very long time. Decade plus on good brands is nothing now. EVs may or may do pretty much the same.
lmz•about 4 hours ago
Surely depreciation is determined by the buyer's expected price? So it doesn't matter if objectively you say the battery is at 95% health but all the buyers apply a steep discount due to it being an EV.
SideburnsOfDoom•about 4 hours ago
Since this is a article about UK car costs, lets look at the UK

> Dacia Spring is now the UK’s cheapest car at less than £12k

> The all-electric Dacia Spring now costs less than any other car on the market

https://www.whatcar.com/news/dacia-spring-is-now-the-uks-che...

The article has an honourable mention for the Leapmotor T03, another EV that is only slightly more expensive than the Dacia Spring.

junaru•about 3 hours ago
EVs are rich people offloading tax burden to less fortunate ones.

Previously (last year) various taxes made almost half the fuel price. We don't have green/car taxes where i live, everyone charges their cars at home and brag how 'cheap it is'. Additionally you can drive in bus lanes if you drive EV (capital only) and you have the perfect nepotism scheme - no taxes, premium transit for anyone already rich enough. No politician dares to bring this up as solution would lead to the introduction of general car tax (political suicide) so once again everyone else is left to pick up the bill after the rich.

metalman•about 3 hours ago
fuel price went up 4% more last night, so we are now at 10x more than electric, and somehow there are 'arguments' bieng profered that there is something left to debate, unless you count in the OTHER discussion hapening around demand collapse for oil. lots of rich people here who will get hurt bad when the petro dollar collapses, but are making more money today than ever before. classic monkey trap.
ErroneousBosh•about 4 hours ago
"Cheaper to run" if you only count the cost of fuel versus the cost of electricity, and only if you can charge at home.

It currently costs 85p/kWh to charge an EV near where I live if you can't charge at home, and 95p/litre for gas (my car is dual fuel).

Then you've got the vastly more expensive insurance for EVs.

Then you've got the cost of paying for an EV.

Then you've got to find an EV that directly replaces the existing vehicle. There are currently no EVs on the market that can tow heavy trailers off road, which is the main reason I have a biggish 4x4.

neilalexander•about 3 hours ago
The cost of public charging is still one of the biggest problems. I'm currently on a night-time charging tariff at home at 4p/kWh. It will go up to 8p/kWh in October but that's still pretty good considering it's not uncommon for public rapid charging to be 10x that.

Of all the rapid charging networks, I find Tesla are often the cheapest, there are Tesla 250kW charging stations near me that are 33p/kWh during quieter hours.

w4der•about 4 hours ago
Why is EV insurance that more expensive than an ICE vehicles'?
turkeywelder•about 3 hours ago
Repair costs are very high (and take ages) and most of them are expensive cars outright which puts the premiums up.

Performance being pretty high on even a basic Tesla doesn't help things either. The insurance market in the UK is very expensive anyway and any excuse to wind up premiums they'll gladly use.

ErroneousBosh•about 3 hours ago
I don't know, but it was going to cost me about two grand a year to insure a Kia Niro EV compared to 200 quid to insure a 4.6 litre Range Rover.

Presumably because (at least round here) they're driven by retired guys who are simply not capable of staying in front of a 700bhp gokart that gets to 60mph faster than if you threw it off a cliff.