MicroLLM Lab – Try 7 tiny LLM's in the browser

llogicallee about 3 hours ago 18 commentsRead Article on stateofutopia.com

DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

80% Positive

Analyzed from 621 words in the discussion.

Discussion (18 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

kenzic•about 1 hour ago

Really cool project. Giving web apps direct access to on-device models is something I’m excited about, and it’s cool to see the different approaches.

I’ve been working on a related proposal called the Web Models API, which explores a browser standard for an API that runs open-weight models on-device. Would love your thoughts: https://www.webmodels.dev

logicallee•about 1 hour ago

I read your proposal, I think it's great! Where will the navigator get the model if the user agrees to download it? For this demonstration I just serve the models on my own server, but for larger models it may be an issue as they may not have direct download links even if they are open weights.

kenzic•about 1 hour ago

Great question. Right now there isn’t a definitive answer, but it’s something that needs to be worked out. There would likely be a registry. The question is how to keep model IDs consistent: does each browser manage its own registry, or is there one shared across browsers?

logicallee•6 minutes ago

Since you're asking for some kinds of permissions anyway, you could ask if the user is willing to also seed the model, p2p. (However, seeding files is not as popular as it used to be, many residential Internet connections don't have good upload.) If you have the capacity for it, your site webmodels.dev could act as a tracker and initial seed for any models. Then it could be the one central registry. It might get to be too much for you though, a lot of the open weights models are huge.

tolugenius•about 2 hours ago

I did the default arithmetic with PetitGPT research-v1

>What is 2+2?

Answer

> To find 2 + 2, we need to add 2 to both sides of the equation.

> 2 + 2 = 4

> So, 2 + 2 = 4 + 2.

Brilliant

dotancohen•29 minutes ago

That's not incorrect.

LLMs produce semantically correct sentences, not factually correct statements. Have we forgotten this so soon?

anyfoo•22 minutes ago

It is, in every sense, incorrect. Which statement in this short snippet is "semantically correct"? (Better LLMs get this right, of course.)

tecleandor•14 minutes ago

GPT-2 124M is terrible...

  > what is 2+2?

Answer:

  > 3+3? 4+4? 5+6? 7+8?
  > Reply ~18000 0 ~10 min 2 By : 1-1: I'm a beginner. 3x2 is my best option, but if you're not sure about the other options then just go for it and try again

krackers•11 minutes ago

It's not instruct tuned looks like? It's closer to a base model rather than a chatbot.

logicallee•20 minutes ago

I got the correct output for that model: https://ibb.co/0pP9DS2T

demibabs•about 1 hour ago

Cool project, but I'd really suggest looking at the UI.

The text is too small and it's way too dense with information in general. Considering how simple this product is to use, it's kinda crazy that I have to scroll through over a page length of (mostly useless, AI-generated) information before getting to the actual interface.

Also what is going on with the footer (why does it link back to the site itself, why is it telling me to "serve over HTTP").

logicallee•25 minutes ago

Thank you for the feedback, I'll think about how to incorporate the changes you've suggested.

phist_mcgee•42 minutes ago

This is the future of software, sloppy ui.

willaaam•about 1 hour ago

I like it as I'm vibecoding an (airgappable) browser AI workspace myself, but in terms of putting the models to use, just exposing the chat interface feels a bit limiting to me.

My take on this concept: https://github.com/willaaam/gemma-4-E2B-webgpu-vision

vs4vijay•about 1 hour ago

I have been experimenting with something similar here - https://sonistellar.com/lab/

inventor7777•about 1 hour ago

PetitGPT told me that

> "2+2 is 2."

Otherwise, a very neat demo. As others have said, the UI is VERY confusing, way too much stuff going on.

dvh•about 1 hour ago

It is. For very small values of 2.

bhouston•about 2 hours ago

I built something like this just last month, using a few of the same models, but I used ThreeJS's Three-Shading-Language abstraction to do it: https://three-llm.ben3d.ca/?model=qwen3.5-0.8b

anonimous-emacs•about 1 hour ago

unfortunately on firefox: Uncaught ReferenceError: GPUShaderStage is not defined

jellyfiz•about 2 hours ago

Similarly, if someone wants to hack some LLMs in their browser and burn some cycles, please feel free to try to break them here:

https://ai-attacks.neal.codes/

derliebej•about 1 hour ago

Wouldn't that be a TLM?

tnrich•about 2 hours ago

i have a bromine tub, give me simple instructions for what to do since i just filled it up w fresh water

1. Add 1 tablespoon of water to the water bath. 2. Place the tub into the water bath and let it sit for about 5 minutes. 3. After 5 minutes, remove the tub and let it cool down. 4. Now, fill the tub with water and let it sit for about

uhmm completely unusable ?

smokel•about 2 hours ago

No, that is not what SLMs are useful for. They have very little knowledge, and typically lack reasoning skills.

Useful applications include sentiment analysis, text classification, entity extraction, etc.

They certainly can be useful, but you shouldn't compare them with LLMs such as Opus or Fable.

ironqcold•about 1 hour ago

Completely unusable for that, yeah, that's a 100M model, not an assistant

logicallee•about 3 hours ago

You can try 7 different tiny LLM's in your browser.

bigfishrunning•about 2 hours ago

What I missed from the title was this: Can I try 7 different tiny LLMs in my browser?

AgentMasterRace•about 2 hours ago

The website literally says they are SLM's .. derp af